Appellate Court overturns Judge Adelman’s dismissal of charge

Court document – “Although First Amendment speech protections are far-reaching, there are limits… …So, whether or not the First Amendment protects White’s right to post personal information about Juror A first turns on his intent in posting that information. If White’s intent in posting Juror A’s personal information was to request that one of his readers harm Juror A, then the crime of solicitation would be complete. No act needed to follow, and no harm needed to befall Juror A. If, on the other hand, White’s intent was to make a political point about sexual orientation or to facilitate opportunities for other people to make such views known to Juror A, then he would not be guilty of solicitation because he did not have the requisite intent required for the crime. White argues that NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982), stands for the proposition that the only permissible view of his posting is to see it as a constitutionally protected expression and subject to the Brandenburg test. In Claiborne, black citizens of Claiborne County, Mississippi, sent a letter to white merchants with a list of particularized demands for racial equality and integration. After receiving an unsatisfactory response, they began a boycott that lasted years. Several of the white merchants sued members of the boycott to recover losses and enjoin further boycott activity, and won. The Mississippi Supreme Court upheld liability as to 92 participants by finding that members had agreed to use force, violence and threats to ensure compliance with the boycott, but the Supreme Court reversed, holding that an individual could not be held liable for his mere association with an organization whose members engage in illegal acts. Id. at 920. Claiborne primarily focused on the constitutionality of group-based liability, but it also concluded that Charles Evers, the field secretary of the NAACP and chief proponent of the boycott at the time, could not be held liable based on his “emotionally charged rhetoric.” Id. at 928. In speeches given before and during the boycott, Evers stated that there would be “discipline” coming to those who did not participate in the boycott, and that any “uncle toms” would “have their necks broken.” Id. at 900 n.28. …White’s argument boils down to this: his posting was not a solicitation and because it is not a solicitation, it is speech deserving of First Amendment protection. The government sees the posting in the opposite light: the posting and website constitute a solicitation and as such, fall outside the parameters of First Amendment protection…”

http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname=infco20100628129

---

From the SPLC blog, July 23, 2009 [Bill White] had been scheduled for trial in Chicago next month, but U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman this week dismissed the indictment charging White with soliciting harm against the juror… “The posting of personal information about an individual involved in a judicial proceeding, even under circumstances that are intimidating or unsettling, cannot, absent a true threat or an incitement to imminent lawless action, be criminalized consistent with the First Amendment,” wrote Adelman in the 35-page decision.

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2009/07/23/3281/

The Plot Against Bill White

Bill White posted this on VNN Forum in October 2008, shortly before his arrest. As we now know, Bill White was arrested and found guilty on some other (trumped-up) charges, the Obama issue never came out, and a number of the people mentioned in this post have also been arrested or put under investigation/harassment by the FBI and other agencies.

“I actually tried to post this on VNN to keep the “white community” up to date on a very important sequence of events, but apparently was moderated several times. This thread may be moderated, too, who knows.

Everything I have had to say on this has been copied here by various persons, so I won’t say any more.

Unfortunately, this thread shows the worst side of VNN — people rambling on calling other people “feds”, claiming I’m “mentally ill”, one person (on another, related thread), claiming I’m “bisexual” — all the nonsense that the moderators allow in favor and instead of good sense.

For the past year I have suffered through dozens of federal efforts to shut down my activities and the activities of the ANSWP, most of which have never made the press, while the actual federal informers who control almost every other white organization on the internet slander and smear me.

The federal attack on the ANSWP has been multi-faceted — bogus grand jury investigations, administrative complaints, IRS audits, Treasury actions, bogus search warrants, physical threats of violence from fed-controlled “white power” skinheads, slanders from fed-controlled antif — its an amazing thing, and to be in the middle of it and to see it all, and then to come here where a lot of people who have never done anything worth investigating sit stewing in paranoia and slander, is disappointing.

We will have all of our server equipment back from the FBI by the end of the week. Overthrow will hopefully return next week. I was taking a short three-day-weekend vacation, and while I did briefly return to Roanoke just to check on the safety of my home, I was not willing to throw the whole weekend away just to back up and running with the website at any cost.

This raid was paired with raids on several of our friends in Europe and several other abusive and harassing actions. What I have seen from the FBI and learned about their activities disgusts me in a profound way. Not being and having never been a criminal, I am shocked at the criminal acts the federal government committed and was willing to have committed in order to further their goal of entrapping me.

I am absolutely convinced that not only Matt Hale, but also Ron Edwards, and, likely, Tom Metzger and others, going back decades, have been entrapped using the exact same playbook that was attempted and failed against the ANSWP. By choosing not to encourage violence and not to recruit criminals, I was able to keep the feds from getting anything they could latch their fingers into.

In my case, I know that the following individuals have given false testimony against me, and / or made false complaints to the federal government about my activities:

Tim Bland
Michael Blevins
Justin Boyer

The following individuals assisted in recruiting these three:

Matthew Ramsey, aka Jim Ramm
Hal Turner

And the informers from the Edwards trial, namely:

Joshua Cowles, aka James Edwards
and the fellow — Matthew Roberts, I believe — in Cleveland

have assisted in activites directed against Michael Burks.

Matthew Ramsey has additionally assisted in directing activites against our Northwest Regional Director, Daniel Jones, and Michael Blevins has reportedly made accusations against our Southern Regional Director, Chris Drake.

Anyone looking at their public statements regarding this case can see their culpability, and I would ask all white activists to judge them by their public statements in this regard.

The American National Socialist Workers Party will triumph, as we have triumphed in every previous case filed against us, and we will triumph because we are innocent.

Those who are saying that I have to be convicted of a crime and sent to prison before they will believe I am “not a federal informer” are as insane and disgusting as those who have bragged of their role in this investigation, and I would ask the white nationalist community to treat them as such.

I can be reached, as always, at nationalsocialistworkers@yahoo.com

The Obama issue of the magazine will ship and be distributed as planned.

Bill White transferred to FCI Beckley

Updated, December 2010.

Bill White is now at the MCC in Chicago for hearings on the The USA vs. William White (the previously dismissed “Matthew Hale Juror A” charge). His release date is January 18th, 2011.

Write to him at:

William A White #13888-084
Metropolitan Correctional Center
71 W Van Buren St
Chicago, IL 60605

---

According to the BOP inmate finder Bill White has been transferred from Roanoke City Jail to Beckley. I think he might be in the camp, but I’m not sure.

WILLIAM A WHITE
Register #13888-084
32-White-M 12-26-2010
BECKLEY FCI

http://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/bec/index.jsp

The Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Beckley is a medium security facility housing male inmates. An adjacent satellite camp houses minimum security inmates.
FCI Beckley is located in Raleigh County, West Virginia, approximately 51 miles southeast of Charleston, and 136 miles northwest of Roanoke, Virginia.
Judicial District: Southern West Virginia

The Beckley phone number is (304) 252-9758.

Video here from local news station WSET on Bill White’s sentence:

http://www.wset.com/news/stories/0410/725603.html

The talking head wonders if Bill White learned anything. Well, I can tell you the snivel rights lady Brenda Hale didn’t learn anything. Did the government prove that Bill White was commanding other people to carry out violent acts? Wake up, Brenda!

Bill White filed a Motion for a New Trial on Count 5 [Kathleen Kerr] on April 12th and a Notice of Appeal on April 22nd. (More on this coming soon.) He won’t be getting out of the concentration camp any earlier, but he is trying to clear his name. Bill maintains that internet postings are free speech protected under the law, therefore, White was convicted for lawful acts on Charge 5. This is an important point, not just for Bill White, but for all internet users. Mark Potok, Morris Dees and all the rest of those speech crimes bastards don’t want you to be upset when you find out that what goes for Nazi Bill White goes for you, too. You may be thrown in jail for internet postings, someday, if they get away with this.

Richard Barrett on Hal Turner

Hal Turner is probably the most famous snitch of the day. His name gets thrown around constantly, especially in reference to disinformation, entrapment or provocation and bizarre FBI black operations against our citizens.

Bill White believes that he was arrested in October, 2008 because Hal Turner had emailed his contact in the FBI a PHONY “tip” about Bill White plotting to blow up the Poff Federal Building in Roanoke, Virginia with a truck bomb.

Here is Richard Barrett, (now dead by n-word), from his crosstar site on the Hal Turner case:

FROM LIAR TO LOSER TO LONER
Free-speech salvaged, but Turner devastated – Richard Barrett

There are three main reasons why I feel compelled to speak out on the Hal Turner case, in behalf of The Nationalist Movement. First, The Movement, apparently, was the first organization that Turner had tried to infiltrate, in March of 2002. Second, The Movement has written the law-of-the-land in the United States Supreme Court on free-speech. Finally, the course must be set, notwithstanding efforts by Turner and his cronies to stigmatize or derail Nationalism. Nationalism is the blood-based form of government, marked by a strong, central state, social-justice for those who work and rule by the majority of its people. In shorthand, Nationalism is the exact opposite of Communism.

Nationalists have been “rising again,” ever since minorities and aliens seized control of the nation, prompting their opponents to use every sort of device to scuttle them, from banishment to imprisonment to ridicule to infiltration to disinformation. Turner became part of the widespread, although illegal and undercover, ploy, to destabilize rightist political activism, which manifests itself in everything from fundamentalist Christians to gun-defenders to segregationists to anti-Communists. In a lawsuit against the FBI, in 1997, Nationalists uncovered secret files, which detailed that the agency had not quit spying on American citizens, even though the practice had been outlawed.

Agents exposed

Agent-provocateur tactics were exposed, on a much broader scale, when Turner was revealed to have been using the Internet to create the false-persona of a would-be assassin, to paint Nationalists as murderers and, even, entrap pro-majority activists into committing crimes. At first, Nationalists rejected Turner and warned against him. However, some insisted that Turner had “free-speech” rights, which, if impinged, would set a bad precedent for rightists, in general. However, being a “snitch” and a “rat” was so unappealing that Nationalists refused to utter any kind words for Turner, at all. Meanwhile, Turner’s wife, Phyllis, decried Nationalists as “snakes.”

Turner pointed to his Indian and Puerto Rican lawyers, his managing of a campaign for a Jew and his Negro and Jewish FBI-handlers as proof that he “never was” a Nationalist. He, also, produced memos to the FBI insisting that he was not what he appeared to be, for which he was paid over $100,000.00. Nationalists have said that they will use the case to press for enforcement of laws against Turner-style agent-provocateurs. Some Turner critics have suggested that Turner “got what he deserved,” by having to spend his loot on lawyers and bail-bonds and going bankrupt. Others say that the way Turner was hung out to dry by the FBI warns others from becoming informants.

Unanimous jury unlikely

A unanimous jury was unlikely at the Brooklyn, New York venue, where minorities abound, but anti-Israeli sentiment runs high. The main witnesses against Turner were Jewish judges, whose “offense” to being “threatened” did not meet the “reasonable-man” test, spelled out by the judge. Being unable to convict Turner, however, only underscores that saying that someone “deserves” to be killed does not override the First Amendment, although, in the same breath, Nationalists warn against threat-making. A “true” threat is when someone has the “imminent” means to “imminently” carry out a threat. A broadcast to a general audience, over the Internet, of “opinion,” does not qualify.

Since Turner fired his lawyers, at his second mis-trial, there has been speculation that Turner might seek legal-counsel from Nationalist lawyers. But, Nationalists say no. If the case were to reach the high-court, which is unlikely, they might file an amicus-curiae brief in support of free-speech, while making clear that Nationalists do not condone disinformation, entrapment or provocation. Some have suggested that Turner might seek to “return” to the very ones he had tried to entrap, saying that “all is forgiven.” Jurors were unimpressed, however, when prosecutors called Turner a liar, but sidestepped that Turner’s handlers were the ones who had lied to the public and to them.

Setback to Dees

The inability to convict Turner has been a setback to Morris Dees, who had claimed that Turner had an actual following and that laws were needed to halt such “danger.” Testimony, even by his opponents, revealed that Turner had no following, however. Abraham Foxman, who had campaigned that flag-wavers, returning-veterans and right-wing third-party supporters were “haters” and whose diatribes had been adopted by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, was the biggest loser. The “danger” he proclaimed had been orchestrated by Obama-Administration officials, whose cover and credibility had been devastated. So, Nationalists only gained in stature.

According to Jeffrey Ullman, “Now is the time for Nationalists to speak out, to get the information out.” Ullman branded Dees, Foxman, Napolitano and Obama as “a movement of lies,” contrasted with The Nationalist Movement, which he termed “a movement of truth.” Ullman pointed out that the news-media had, also, taken a hit, because it had referred to Turner as a “right-winger,” even when Turner, himself, as well as prosecutors, asserted otherwise. With Turner exposed as a fraud, the public as asking, “Will the real Nationalists please stand up?” “It is a risk to speak out,” warns Ullman, “but our words and actions are one-hundred percent patriotic and empowering Americans.”

Richard Barrett Murdered by Black Thug

Local news story from WJTV here

the arrest of Vincent McGee, blame slavery

I don’t know anything about Richard Barrett, but there seems to me to be something very fishy about a New Jersey lawyer moving to Mississippi and doing what he did.

If he WAS homosexual or part Jewish, the mainstream media would never tell us, because they want to promote a phony image of Mississippi. (As if white people in Mississippi have the nerve to stand up for their rights, and can go to court for their rights and win. )

Note: To me, it looks like Richard Barrett is just another elderly white Southerner senselessly killed in his own home by a black thug. I don’t think there is anything newsworthy about this in post-civil rights America.

Article by James Edwards of The Political Cesspool See also his white people must die article.

It seems Bill White and Richard Barrett had mixed it up at one time. As nationalist.org tells it, Richard Barrett got Bill White kicked off the internet, and Bill White sued in 2004 to have Richard Barrett disbarred. The lawsuit was dismissed.

Here is a list of Barrett’s considerable Nationalist accomplishments :
http://www.nationalist.org

Below, Barrett warns people not to follow Bill White’s example.

Comment by Richard Barrett regarding the Bill White trial, from the Crosstar messageboard:

Bill White trial
by crosstar » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:22 pm

The Bill White trial, set for July 27th, has been put off, supposedly until August 11th. But, there are some interesting developments. First, a final pre-trial conference was scheduled for yesterday, but it was “adjourned” by the judge, meaning that it is not being rescheduled. Secondly, the judge said that there would be a subsequent order entered. This seems to indicate that White will be copping a plea and that no trial will be held, but not necessarily.

The setting of the trial-date could be just a “formality.” On the other hand, another scenario could be that the judge might be contemplating dismissing the charges, rather than receiving a plea.

There are, certainly, free-speech elements to the case, but, the egregious conduct, coupled with White’s admitted “mental-disorder,” does not offer any sort of “example” to others, but, instead, a warning of a path not to go down. Those who have expressed interest in covering the White trial are encouraged to be “on hold,” pending further announcements.
crosstar
Top Rank
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:37 pm
Location: Mississippi
E-mailWebsiteICQ

H.R. 1966 Censorship Law now in effect?

Perhaps the government is not so dumb as they appear. Last year certain traitors to our nation were pitching H.R. 1966.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/07/hr-1966-sec-881.html

It was never passed into law. But, I think it just went into effect with this trial. Bill White got two and half years jail time for all his “zany antics” and thought crimes. Under H.R. 1966, the maximum penalty for sending any – ANY – “hostile” email was two years. Hmmm. It looks to me like the stage has been set for total internet censorship of rude or critical remarks of any kind, whatsover. All because Judge Turk, may his name live in infamy, threw out the standard definition of “credible threat”.